A working group of cIMPACT-NOW evaluated the literature on IDH-mutant gliomas for opportunities to improve pathology-based risk stratification and grading, especially at the interface of CNS WHO grade 2 and 3, since therapeutic decisions depend on risk assessment for clinical management. The group also evaluated newly described IDH-mutant glioma subgroups and considered multidisciplinary aspects of therapeutic decision-making. PDGFRA amplification was associated with highly aggressive clinical behavior of IDH-mutant astrocytomas, consistent with CNS WHO grade 4. Other genetic alterations associated with intermediate risk and most consistent with CNS WHO grade 3 included PIK3 mutations, EGFR amplification, MYCN amplification and specific RB pathway alterations, including CDK4, CDK6 and CCND2 amplification, RB1 homozygous deletion or mutation, and mutation of CDKN2A. DNA methylation signatures of G-CIMP-low or AIDHHG were consistent with CNS WHO grade 3 or 4, depending upon other grading criteria. We suggest a mitotic count of ≥ 3 per 2. 4 mm2 could be considered as a CNS WHO grade 3 criterion. Our review did not uncover features to improve grading of oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted, although CNS WHO grade 3 tumors with elevated mitotic rates, yet lacking necrosis, microvascular proliferation, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and MRI contrast enhancement, may be associated with extended survival. Implementing evidence-based criteria for risk stratification and grading will improve guidance for clinical decision-making.
Brat et al. (Thu,) studied this question.