Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
The purpose of the study. This study was to analyze the method of passing training with fixed target eye-foot coordination high-low and target passing moving eye-foot coordination high-low and analyze the interaction between passing training methods and eye-foot coordination on football passing accuracy. Materials and methods. This study used a quasi-experimental method of pre-test and post-test design. The population in this study was 36 players with an average age of 16 years. The sampling technique used was total sampling with a total sample of 36 players, data analysis used the ANOVA test. Results. 1) There is a difference in the effect between fixed target passing practice and moving target passing on football passing accuracy on average p = (82.78±7.51), p-value = (0.000Ftable (0.225). 2) There is a different effect between high and low eye-foot coordination on soccer passing accuracy where the value of sig p-value = (0.007 Ftable (0.225). 3) There is a difference in the Effect of Fixed Target Passing Training Method with High and Low Eye-foot Coordination on Soccer Passing Accuracy with an average value of p = (83.33> 67.78). 4) There is a difference in the effect of moving target passing practice with high and low eye-foot coordination on soccer passing accuracy with an average value of p=(85.56>80.00). 5) There is no interaction between training methods and eye-foot coordination on football passing accuracy with sig p-value = (0.053>0.05) and Fcount (4.050) >Ftable (0.225). Conclusions. Research shows that moving target passing exercises are better at improving passing accuracy than fixed target passing exercises and players with high eye-foot coordination have better accuracy than players with low eye-foot coordination.
Alficandra et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: