A novel deep learning model trained on raw unipolar electrograms accurately classified Focal Source and Trigger (FaST) sites during atrial fibrillation with an area under the curve of 0.923.
Observational (n=78)
No
Does a deep learning model applied to raw unipolar EGMs accurately classify focal sources compared to manual classification by cardiologists in patients with atrial fibrillation?
A novel deep learning model trained on raw unipolar EGMs can accurately and automatically classify focal sources in atrial fibrillation, performing similarly to expert cardiologists.
Focal sources are potential targets for atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation, but they can be time-consuming and challenging to identify when unipolar electrograms (EGM) are numerous and complex. Our aim was to apply deep learning (DL) to raw unipolar EGMs in order to automate putative focal sources detection. We included 78 patients from the Focal Source and Trigger (FaST) randomized controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy of adjunctive FaST ablation compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone in reducing AF recurrence. FaST sites were identified based on manual classification of sustained periodic unipolar QS EGMs over 5-s. All periodic unipolar EGMs were divided into training ( n = 10,004) and testing cohorts ( n = 3,180). DL was developed using residual convolutional neural network to discriminate between FaST and non-FaST. A gradient-based method was applied to interpret the DL model. DL classified FaST with a receiver operator characteristic area under curve of 0.904 ± 0.010 (cross-validation) and 0.923 ± 0.003 (testing). At a prespecified sensitivity of 90%, the specificity and accuracy were 81.9 and 82.5%, respectively, in detecting FaST. DL had similar performance (sensitivity 78%, specificity 89%) to that of FaST re-classification by cardiologists (sensitivity 78%, specificity 79%). The gradient-based interpretation demonstrated accurate tracking of unipolar QS complexes by select DL convolutional layers. In conclusion, our novel DL model trained on raw unipolar EGMs allowed automated and accurate classification of FaST sites. Performance was similar to FaST re-classification by cardiologists. Future application of DL to classify FaST may improve the efficiency of real-time focal source detection for targeted AF ablation therapy.
Liao et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=78). Deep learning (DL) classification model (1-D residual convolutional neural network) vs. Manual classification by cardiologists / Classic machine learning models was evaluated on Receiver operator characteristic area under curve (ROC AUC) for FaST classification in the testing cohort (95% CI 0.917-0.929). A novel deep learning model trained on raw unipolar electrograms accurately classified Focal Source and Trigger (FaST) sites during atrial fibrillation with an area under the curve of 0.923.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: