Pulse nav.journalClub Debates activos Tendencias Explorar Investigadores

Download the App

Join discussions, follow papers, and never miss your next session.

Download on theApp Store

© Synapse Social LLC, 2026

Política de privacidad

Inicio Explorar nav.journalClub Tendencias

⌘+K

Implications of Seemingly Irrelevant Evidence in Audit Judgment | Synapse

January 1, 1992

Implications of Seemingly Irrelevant Evidence in Audit Judgment

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

Auditing, Nondiagnostic evidence, Seemingly Irrelevant evidence, Audit judgment

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Cite This Study

Karl E. Hackenbrack (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ed28525c30b2cc7f9ceb8 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2491095

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Human Information Processing in Accounting1982 · 131 citations
2Features of similarity.1977 · 7,291 citations
3Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect.1989 · 396 citations
4The Impact of Analytical Review Results, Internal Control Reliability, and Experience on Auditors' Use of Analytical Review1989 · 76 citations
5The dilution effect: The role of the correlation and the dispersion of predictor variables in the use of nondiagnostic information.1982 · 94 citations