Cooled intramural needle ablation created significantly deeper, wider, and more frequently transmural lesions (38% vs 0%, P=0.03) than an irrigated tip catheter in sheep hearts.
RCT (n=14)
Randomly allocated positions
Does an internally cooled intramural needle ablation catheter create deeper and wider lesions compared to an irrigated tip ablation catheter in a sheep model?
A novel cooled intramural needle ablation catheter creates deeper, wider, and more frequently transmural lesions than standard irrigated tip catheters in a sheep model, highlighting its potential for treating refractory ventricular tachycardia.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 38% vs 0%
valor p: p=0.03
OBJECTIVES: To design and test a catheter that could create deeper ablation lesions. BACKGROUND: Endocardial radiofrequency (RF) ablation is unable to reliably create transmural ventricular lesions. We designed an intramural needle ablation catheter with an internally cooled 1.1-mm diameter straight needle that could be advanced up to 14 mm into the myocardium. The prototype catheter was compared with an irrigated tip ablation catheter. METHODS: Ablation lesions were created under general anesthesia in 14 male sheep (weight 44 +/- 7.3 kg) with fluoroscopic guidance. Each of the catheters was used to create two ablation lesions at randomly allocated positions within the left ventricle. The irrigation rate, target temperature, and maximum power were: 20 mL/min, 85 degrees C, 50 W for the intramural needle catheter and 20 mL/min, 50 degrees C, 50 W for the irrigated tip catheter, respectively. All ablations were performed for 2 minutes. After the last ablation, blue tetrazolium (12.5 mg/kg) was infused intravenously. The heart was removed via a left thoracotomy after monitoring the sheep for one hour. RESULTS: There was no evidence of cardiac tamponade in any sheep. The intramural needle catheter lesions were significantly wider (10.9 +/- 2.8 mm vs 10.1 +/- 2.4 mm, P = 0.01), deeper (9.6 +/- 2.0 mm vs 7.0 +/- 1.3 mm, P = 0.01), and more likely to be transmural (38% vs 0%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Cooled intramural needle ablation creates lesions that are significantly deeper and wider than endocardial RF ablation using an irrigated tip catheter in sheep hearts. This technology may be useful in treating ventricular tachycardia resistant to conventional ablation techniques.
Thiagalingam et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Preclinical ablation model (n=14). Cooled intramural needle ablation catheter vs. Irrigated tip ablation catheter was evaluated on Transmural lesion creation (p=0.03). Cooled intramural needle ablation created significantly deeper, wider, and more frequently transmural lesions (38% vs 0%, P=0.03) than an irrigated tip catheter in sheep hearts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: