An XGBoost machine learning model using nine clinical features predicted the risk of repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with an AUC of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.762-0.859).
Cohort (n=1,073)
No
Does an explainable machine learning model accurately predict the risk of repeat catheter ablation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
An explainable XGBoost machine learning model using nine routine clinical variables can accurately predict the need for repeat catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Estimación del efecto: AUC 0.811 (95% CI 0.762-0.859)
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide. Catheter ablation is the first-line therapy for symptomatic/refractory AF, yet post-procedural recurrence remains extremely common, driving a high rate of repeat ablation procedures. Repeat ablation is associated with elevated medical costs, incremental procedural risks, and impaired quality of life and clinical outcomes in affected patients. Existing clinical risk scores for predicting repeat AF ablation have limited discriminative ability, poor interpretability, and suboptimal clinical utility. This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning model, using routine clinical and echocardiographic features, to predict the risk of requiring repeat catheter ablation for AF. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 1073 patients undergoing AF ablation from 2012 to 2023 was analyzed, with data split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm, followed by the construction of eight machine learning models. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, balanced accuracy, Brier score, and clinical utility via decision curve analysis. Interpretability was enhanced using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Results: Among 1073 patients undergoing AF ablation, 352 (32.8%) required a second procedure. LASSO regression combined with the Boruta algorithm identified nine predictive features: NT-proBNP, age, globulin (GLO), direct bilirubin (DBIL), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cystatin C (Cys-C), smoking history, creatine kinase (CK), and urea. Among the eight models evaluated, XGBoost demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving an AUC of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.762-0.859) in the testing cohort, with a sensitivity of 0.748, specificity of 0.726, and Brier score of 0.1682. It also outperformed alternative models in terms of F1 score and clinical net benefit. SHAP analysis confirmed NT-proBNP and age as the most influential predictors, alongside non-linear contributions from the remaining variables. Conclusion: The XGBoost model may provide a useful and interpretable tool for predicting repeat AF ablation, providing clinical insights to guide patient management and optimize procedural outcomes.
Shang et al. (Sun,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,073). XGBoost machine learning model vs. Alternative machine learning models was evaluated on Predicting the risk of requiring repeat catheter ablation for AF (AUC 0.811, 95% CI 0.762-0.859). An XGBoost machine learning model using nine clinical features predicted the risk of repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with an AUC of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.762-0.859).