Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) aims to evaluate the distribution of magnetic susceptibility from magnetic resonance phase measurements by solving the ill-conditioned dipole inversion problem. Removing the artifacts and preserving the anisotropy of tissue susceptibility simultaneously is still a challenge in QSM. To deal with this issue, a novel k-QSM network is proposed to resolve dipole inversion issues in QSM reconstruction. The k-QSM network converts the results obtained by truncated k-space division (TKD) into the Fourier domain as inputs. After passing through several convolutional and residual blocks, the ill-posed signals of TKD are corrected by making the network output close to the calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS)-labeled QSM. To evaluate the superiority of k-QSM, comparisons with several state-of-the-art methods are performed in terms of QSM artifacts removing, anisotropy preserving, generalization ability, and clinical applications. Compared to existing methods, the k-QSM achieves a 22.31% lower normalized root mean square error, 10.30% higher peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), 33.10% lower high-frequency error norm, and 1.06% higher structural similarity. In addition, the orientation-dependent susceptibility variation obtained by k-QSM is significant, verifying that k-QSM has the ability to preserve susceptibility anisotropy. When the trained models are tested on the dataset from different centers, our k-QSM shows a strong generalization ability with the highest PSNR. Moreover, by comparing the susceptibility maps between healthy controls and drug addicts with different methods, we found the proposed k-QSM is more sensitive to the susceptibility abnormality in the patients. The proposed k-QSM method learns less-only to fix the ill-posed signals of TKD, but infers more-both COSMOS-like and anisotropy-preserving QSM results. Its generalization ability and great sensitivity to susceptibility changes can make it a potential method for distinguishing some diseases.
He et al. (Wed,) studied this question.