PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 13, 2010Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences991 citationsOpen Access

The happiness–income paradox revisited

View Full Paper
RERichard A. EasterlinLMLaura Angelescu McVeyMSMalgorzata Switek

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The striking thing about the happiness-income paradox is that over the long-term--usually a period of 10 y or more--happiness does not increase as a country's income rises. Heretofore the evidence for this was limited to developed countries. This article presents evidence that the long term nil relationship between happiness and income holds also for a number of developing countries, the eastern European countries transitioning from socialism to capitalism, and an even wider sample of developed countries than previously studied. It also finds that in the short-term in all three groups of countries, happiness and income go together, i.e., happiness tends to fall in economic contractions and rise in expansions. Recent critiques of the paradox, claiming the time series relationship between happiness and income is positive, are the result either of a statistical artifact or a confusion of the short-term relationship with the long-term one.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Easterlin et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f39a114089a5783bde037https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015962107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper