CYP2C9 genotype-guided warfarin therapy increased time in the therapeutic range (80.4% vs 63.4%, P<0.001) and reduced minor bleeding (3.2% vs 12.5%, P<0.02) compared to a standard algorithm.
RCT (n=191)
Randomized
Does CYP2C9 genotype-guided warfarin prescribing improve the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation compared to a standard algorithm in patients requiring warfarin?
CYP2C9 genotype-guided warfarin dosing significantly reduces the time to therapeutic INR and stable anticoagulation while increasing time in therapeutic range and reducing minor bleeding compared to standard dosing.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 80.4% vs 63.4%
valor p: p=<0.001
Warfarin anticoagulation effect is characterized by marked variability, some of which has been attributed to CYP2C9 polymorphisms. This study prospectively examines whether a priori knowledge of CYP2C9 genotype may improve warfarin therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive warfarin by a validated algorithm ("control", 96 patients) or CYP2C9 genotype-adjusted algorithms ("study", 95 patients). The first therapeutic international normalized ratio and stable anticoagulation were reached 2.73 and 18.1 days earlier in the study group, respectively (P<0.001). The faster rate of initial anticoagulation was driven by a 28% higher daily dose in the study group (P<0.001). Study group patients spent more time within the therapeutic range (80.4 vs 63.4%, respectively, P<0.001) and experienced less minor bleeding (3.2 vs 12.5%, P<0.02, respectively). In conclusion, CYP2C9 genotype-guided warfarin therapy is more efficient and safer than the "average-dose" protocol. Future research should focus on construction of algorithms that incorporate other polymorphisms (VKORC1), host factors, and environmental influences.
Caraco et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in Patients requiring warfarin anticoagulation (n=191). CYP2C9 genotype-adjusted warfarin algorithm vs. Validated algorithm ('average-dose' protocol) was evaluated on Time within the therapeutic range (p=<0.001). CYP2C9 genotype-guided warfarin therapy increased time in the therapeutic range (80.4% vs 63.4%, P<0.001) and reduced minor bleeding (3.2% vs 12.5%, P<0.02) compared to a standard algorithm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: