Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Three independent surface soil moisture datasets for the period 1979–87 are compared: 1) global retrievals from the Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (SMMR), 2) global soil moisture derived from observed meteorological forcing using the NASA Catchment Land Surface Model, and 3) ground-based measurements in Eurasia and North America from the Global Soil Moisture Data Bank. Time-average soil moisture fields from the satellite and the model largely agree in the global patterns of wet and dry regions. Moreover, the time series and anomaly time series of monthly mean satellite and model soil moisture are well correlated in the transition regions between wet and dry climates where land initialization may be important for seasonal climate prediction. However, the magnitudes of time-average soil moisture and soil moisture variability are markedly different between the datasets in many locations. Absolute soil moisture values from the satellite and the model are very different, and neither agrees better with ground data, implying that a ‘‘correct’ ’ soil moisture climatology cannot be identified with confidence from the available global data. The discrepancies between the datasets point to a need for bias estimation and correction or rescaling before satellite soil moisture can be assimilated into land surface models. 1.
Reichle et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: