Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract This paper presents the findings from a thematic literature review focusing the general research question: Which ethical dimensions are relevant for the design and evaluation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Education? It follows the constructive grounded theory to propose a theoretical framework for ethical AI and Education (AI&ED) transferring the quality dimensions of the educational sector to the specific field of AI&ED. To answer the research question, the paper starts with a literature review and discussion of the relationship between AI and Education (AI&ED). We present that education is a special sector for three main reasons: Education is (1) a human right, (2) a complex ecosystem and (3) self-learning. Thus, it requires particular rules and regulations for the AI introduction and use, leading to general benefits. Ongoing developments of AI regulations are currently missing a recognition of this important demand and of the vulnerability of the educational sector. Human rights, democracy, and rule of law as the key global values should guide the ethical debate about AI&ED in combination with specific educational requirements. Based on our literature analysis and discussions, we propose to transfer and adapt the three generic learning quality dimensions to the AI&ED design and evaluation leading to the three dimensions: AI&ED objectives, AI&ED implementations and AI&ED results. In future AI&ED research, they can be validated to focus educational purposes for AI selection. Finally, we recommend three ethical imperatives for the AI&ED design and research directions: (1) impact-oriented, (2) technology-independent and (3) society-focused to guarantee positive achievements and benefits by AI&ED for all three educational levels and involved stakeholders. All stakeholders in education should call for broad discussions to gain consensus on AI permits and prohibitions and to facilitate regulation of AI&ED reflecting the requirements of the special sector and our societal future.
Christian M. Stracke (Wed,) studied this question.