Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
10008 Background: Survival of pediatric ALL patients (pts) now approaches 90%, but is historically poor for those who relapse. Methods: In the largest cohort assembled to date we analyzed overall survival (OS) rate post relapse, defined as duration between date of relapse and death, among pts diagnosed from 1996-2014 treated on 10 contemporary COG frontline trials. Comparisons of post-relapse OS were based on logrank tests, with two-sided p values reported. Results: Of 15,874 pts enrolled on frontline trials, 1,967(12%) relapsed. Relapse rates ranged from 35% in infant ALL to 9.7% in pts with NCI standard risk B-ALL. Rates were similar for T and B-ALL, 11% vs. 12%. Relapse patterns differed by phenotype: almost half of non-infant B-ALL relapses occurred late (≥36 mos), and at all time periods bone marrow (BM) relapse predominated. Conversely 65% of T-ALL relapses were early ( 10 yrs at diagnosis, initial WBC > 100K, and T-cell phenotype were associated with worse outcomes post relapse (all p < 0.01). Sex, CNS status at diagnosis, or prior therapy on POG versus CCG/COG backbone did not influence OS. Compared to pts treated from 1988-2002 (Nguyen et al. Leukemia 2008), 5yr OS rate post relapse has improved over time for B-ALL from 37±2% to 52±1% (p < 0.001) and T-ALL from 23±4% to 33±3% (p < 0.05). 5-yr OS rates improved significantly for pts with iBM from 24±2% to 45±2% (p < 0.001) and marginally for pts with iCNS from 59±3% to 65±3% (p = 0.15). Conclusions: In the modern era there are fewer relapses for B and T-ALL, however sites of recurrence and outcomes differ by phenotype. Infants continue to do poorly. Compared to prior analyses, survival after relapse is significantly improved.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Susan R. Rheingold
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Lingyun Ji
University of Southern California
Xinxin Xu
Children's Oncology Group
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Johns Hopkins University
University of California, San Francisco
University of Southern California
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rheingold et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a105cee90ecb39bf65fd95c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.10008