Pulse Explorar nav.journalClub Debates Tendencias Investigadores Revistas

Join discussions, follow papers, and never miss your next session.

Download on theApp Store

Inicio Explorar nav.journalClub Tendencias

⌘+K

Reconciling Conflicting Evidence on the Performance of Propensity-Score Matching Methods | Synapse

May 1, 2001

Ver artículo completo

Reconciling Conflicting Evidence on the Performance of Propensity-Score Matching Methods

JSJeffrey A. SmithBank of America PTPetra ToddPopulation Council

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

Reconciling Conflicting Evidence on the Performance of Propensity-Score Matching Methods by Jeffrey A. Smith and Petra E. Todd. Published in volume 91, issue 2, pages 112-118 of American Economic Review, May 2001

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Smith et al. (Tue,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10c665ed67694fb09f6e1b https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.112

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1The Pre-Program Earnings Dip and the Determinants of Participation in a Social Program: Implications for Simple Program Evaluation Strategies1999 · 119 citations
2The National Supported Work Demonstration.1985 · 120 citations
3American Economic Review2019 · 11,003 citations
4The Pre‐programme Earnings Dip and the Determinants of Participation in a Social Programme. Implications for Simple Programme Evaluation Strategies1999 · 391 citations
5Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs1999 · 2,396 citations