A novel nonlinearity test that uses the autocorrelation function without generating surrogates successfully identified linear and nonlinear time series models.
A novel nonlinearity test for time series that avoids the generation of surrogates provides an alternative to avoid spurious nonlinearities in the null hypothesis.
The linear or nonlinear nature of a dynamical system is often evaluated by applying nonlinearity tests to an experimental time series that is typically the only observable output of the system. The most widely used nonlinearity test is the method of surrogates: a set of linear time series that replicate the properties of the experimental time series, specifically the marginal distribution and the autocorrelation function. This set of surrogates represents the null hypothesis of linearity, and can be created by several techniques. However, these techniques typically require some degree of manipulation in the frequency domain that often produces correlations in the Fourier phases leading to undesired nonlinear correlations in the surrogates. Here, we present a nonlinearity test that does not rely on generating surrogates, therefore avoiding the problem of spurious nonlinearities in the null hypothesis. Our approach uses the autocorrelation function of the time series under assessment to statistically determine whether the observed correlations could arise from a linear Gaussian time series that has been reversibly transformed into the experimental time series. If so, the experimental time series is considered linear; if not, it is considered nonlinear. We have applied the test to several well known models of linear and nonlinear time series, obtaining excellent results in both cases.
Carpena et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Complex time series. Nonlinearity test without surrogates vs. Method of surrogates was evaluated on Nonlinearity detection. A novel nonlinearity test that uses the autocorrelation function without generating surrogates successfully identified linear and nonlinear time series models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: