4D PC-MRI measurements of lumen area pulsatility and blood flow velocity pulsatility were comparable to 2D PC-MRI, with a mean difference of 0.03 for both aPI and vPI.
Observational (n=7)
No
Does 4D PC-MRI with proposed software accurately measure aPI and vPI compared to 2D PC-MRI in volunteers?
4D PC-MRI with the proposed software can accurately measure arterial lumen area and blood flow velocity pulsatility indices compared to 2D PC-MRI, potentially aiding in the assessment of intracranial arterial stiffness.
Estimación del efecto: Mean difference 0.03 (aPI), 0.03 (vPI) (95% CI -0.14 to 0.23 (aPI), -0.17 to 0.23 (vPI))
4D phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) allows for the visualization and quantification of the cerebral blood flow. A drawback of software that is used to quantify the cerebral blood flow is that it oftentimes assumes a static arterial luminal area over the cardiac cycle. Quantifying the lumen area pulsatility index (aPI), i.e. the change in lumen area due to an increase in distending pressure over the cardiac cycle, can provide insight in the stiffness of the arteries. Arterial stiffness has received increased attention as a predictor in the development of cerebrovascular disease. In this study, we introduce software that allows for measurement of the aPI as well as the blood flow velocity pulsatility index (vPI) from 4D PC-MRI. The internal carotid arteries of seven volunteers were imaged using 7 T MRI. The aPI and vPI measurements from 4D PC-MRI were validated against measurements from 2D PC-MRI at two levels of the internal carotid arteries (C3 and C7). The aPI and vPI computed from 4D PC-MRI were comparable to those measured from 2D PC-MRI (aPI: mean difference: 0.03 (limits of agreement: -0.14 - 0.23); vPI: 0.03 (-0.17-0.23)). The measured blood flow rate for the C3 and C7 segments was similar, indicating that our proposed software correctly captures the variation in arterial lumen area and blood flow velocity that exists along the distal end of the carotid artery. Our software may potentially aid in identifying changes in arterial stiffness of the intracranial arteries caused by pathological changes to the vessel wall.
Hespen et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Healthy volunteers (n=7). 4D PC-MRI vs. 2D PC-MRI was evaluated on Mean difference in lumen area pulsatility index (aPI) and blood flow velocity pulsatility index (vPI) (Mean difference 0.03 (aPI), 0.03 (vPI), 95% CI -0.14 to 0.23 (aPI), -0.17 to 0.23 (vPI)). 4D PC-MRI measurements of lumen area pulsatility and blood flow velocity pulsatility were comparable to 2D PC-MRI, with a mean difference of 0.03 for both aPI and vPI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: