Time and Heritage

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1. Michel De Certeau, Histoire et psychanalyse entre science et fiction History and Psychoanalysis between Science and Fiction, p. 89, Paris, Gallimard, 1987; see Jean Leduc, Les Historiens et le temps, Conceptions, problématiques, écritures Historians and Time, Conceptions, Problematics, Writings, Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1999. Google Scholar 2. François Hartog, ‘Marshall Sahlins et l'anthropologie de l'histoire Marshall Sahlins and the Anthropology of History’, Annales ESC, Vol. 6, 1983, pp. 125–63. Google Scholar 3. Reinhart Koselleck, Le futur passé The Past Future (trans. by J. Hoock and M.-C. Hoock), pp. 307–29. Paris, Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 1990, Google Scholar 4. Paul Ricoeur, La Mémoire, l'histoire, l'oubli Memory, History, Forgetting,, p. 480–98, Paris, Editions du Seuil, 2000; ‘Mémoire: approches historiennes, approche philosophique Memory’: Historic Approaches, Philosophical Approach’, Le Débat The Debate, Vol. 122, 2002, pp.42–4. Google Scholar 5. Jean François Lyotard, ‘Les Indiens ne cueillent pas de fleurs Indians Do Not Pick Flowers’, Annales, Vol. 20, 1965, p. 65 (see the article concerning The Savage Mind by Claude Lévi-Strauss). Google Scholar 6. For example, Günter Grass, Toute une histoire A Long Story (trans. by C. Porcell and B. Lortholary), Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1997; Cees Nooteboom, Le Jour des morts The Day of the Dead (trans. by P. Noble), Arles, Actes Sud, 2001. Google Scholar 7. François Etienne, ‘Reconstruction allemande German reconstruction’, in Jacques Le Goff (ed.), Patrimoine et passions identitaires Heritage and Identity Passions p. 313, Paris, Fayard, 1998, (see the quotation by Scharoun); Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper, ‘Les monuments de l'histoire contemporaine à Berlin: ruptures, contradictions et cicatrices Monuments of Contemporary History in Berlin: Ruptures, Contradictions and Scars’, in Régis Debray (ed.), L'Abus monumental Monumental Abuse, pp. 363–70. Paris, Fayard, 1999. Google Scholar 8. See the website of the World Heritage Centre, which counted 730 hits at the end of 2002. Google Scholar 9. Debray, op. cit., particularly ‘Le monument ou la transmission comme tragédie The Monument or Transmission as Tragedy’, pp. 11–32; see also Tzvetan Todorov, Les abus de la mémoire The Misuses of Memory, Paris, Arléa, 1995. Google Scholar 10. Marc Bourdier, ‘Le mythe et l'industrie ou la protection du patrimoine culturel au Japon Myth and Industry or the Protection of Cultural Heritage in Japan’, Genèses, Vol. 11, 1993, pp. 82–110. Google Scholar 11. Nicolas Fiévé, ‘Architecture et patrimoine au Japon: les mots du monument historique Architecture and Heritage in Japan: the Words of the Historic Monument’, in Debray, op. cit, p. 333. Google Scholar 12. This is the exact title of a text by the Italian architect Camillo Boito, published in 1893, where he tries to define an intermediary position between that illustrated by Viollet-le-Duc – (‘Restoring a building is not maintaining, repairing or rebuilding it, it is restoring it in a finished state that may have never existed at any specific moment’, (Dictionnaire de l'architecture Dictionary of Architecture) – and that of Ruskin – (‘preserve absolutely, to the point of creating ruins if necessary’), see Leniaud, op. cit. p. 186–8. Google Scholar 13. Masahiro Ogino, ‘La logique d'actualization. Le patrimoine au Japon The Logic of Actualization. The Heritage of Japan’, Ethnologie française French Ethnology, Vol. 25, 1995, pp.57–63. Google Scholar 14. Françoise Choay, foreword by Alois Riegl, ibid.. p. 9. Google Scholar 15. The Athens conference was held at the initiative of the International Commission for the Intellectual Co-operation of the Society of Nations and the International Council of Museums, see below. Google Scholar 16. The number of protected buildings rose from 24,000 in 1960 to 44,709 in 1996. Google Scholar 17. Hervé Glevarec and Guy Saez, Le patrimoine saisi par les associations Heritage in the Hands of Associations, La Documentation française, 2002, pp. 129–93. Google Scholar 18. Ibid. p. 263. Google Scholar 19. Koichiro Matsuura, ‘Eloge du patrimoine culturel immatériel Eulogy of Intangible Cultural Heritage’, Le Monde, 11 September 2002. Google Scholar