Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
• The proposed ACLC fully utilizing the electrical quantities of the line to identify the fault area has achieved the selectivity of ACLC, preventing ACLC from expanding the scope of fault impact. • The proposed ACLC start-up threshold and control parameters are independent of the simulation. • The proposed ACLC presents a phased approach that satisfies both speed and selectivity. • The proposed ACLC can effectively limit the fault current and has certain adaptability to the fault type, fault resistance, and noise. The modular multilevel converters (MMC) based high-voltage direct-current (HVDC) grids have a fast rise rate and higher peak value of fault current. The active current limiting control (ACLC) of MMC can effectively reduce the breaking current of DC circuit breakers (DCCB) and reduce the requirement for rapid fault identification in the line protection. However, the current ACLC based on changing the MMC control strategy cannot meet the selectivity requirements. The lack of selectivity may lead to power transmission on non-faulty lines in a multi-terminal DC power grid, thus expanding the range of fault influence. Therefore, this paper proposed a selective and staged ACLC. Firstly, the starting range of ACLC is determined according to the selective requirement and purpose of ACLC in the flexible DC power grid. Secondly, a staged ACLC approach was proposed to balance the speed and selectivity of ACLC. In this approach, the single end and both terminals electrical quantities of the line are fully utilized as the starting criteria for staged ACLC, and corresponding ACLC principles are proposed. Finally, the AC side current and MMC bridge arm current under ACLC were analyzed, and an ACLC scheme was proposed in coordination with DC circuit breakers (DCCB) and fault identification. The simulation results show that the proposed ACLC guarantees the current limiting ability and the MMC does not block during the whole fault period, and has a certain adaptability to the fault type, fault resistance, and noise.
Hou et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: