Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
This essay reclaims a political proceduralist vision of democracy as the best normative defense of democracy in contemporary politics. We distinguish this vision from three main approaches that are representative in the current academic debate: the epistemic conception of democracy as a process of truth seeking; the populist defense of democracy as a mobilizing politics that defies procedures; and the classical minimalist or Schumpeterian definition of democracy as a competitive method for selecting leaders.
Saffon et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: