The Effect of Legislative Requirements on the Use of Breast-Conserving Surgery

BACKGROUND: We studied the effect of state legislation requiring the disclosure of options for the treatment of breast cancer on the use of breast-conserving surgery in clinical practice. METHODS: The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry provided data on women from 30 through 79 years of age who underwent breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy for local or regional breast cancer from 1983 through 1990. We examined the trend over time in use of breast-conserving surgery among patients in four sites (Connecticut, Iowa, Seattle, and Utah) where there were no state laws specifically requiring the disclosure of options for the treatment of breast cancer by physicians. For four additional sites (Detroit, Atlanta, New Mexico, and Hawaii) that had such legislation, we determined whether the rate of breast-conserving surgery after the legislation was different from the expected rate. RESULTS: An attorney rated the legislation as giving most direction to physicians in Michigan, followed by Hawaii, Georgia, and New Mexico. The rate of breast-conserving surgery was up to 8.7 percent higher than expected in Detroit for six months after the passage of the Michigan law (P<0.01). The rate was up to 13.2 percent higher than expected in Hawaii for 12 months after that state's law was passed (P<0.05) and up to 6.0 percent higher than expected in Atlanta for 3 months after the passage of the Georgia law (P<0.01). After these transient increases, the surgery rates reverted to the expected levels. No significant effect was detected in New Mexico, where only a resolution without legal force was passed. CONCLUSION: Legislation requiring physicians to disclose options for the treatment of breast cancer appeared to have only a slight and transient effect on the rate of use of breast-conserving surgery.