A 12-week Tabata-style functional high-intensity interval training program significantly improved relative maximal oxygen uptake (d = 2.53) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity compared to control in female university students.
RCT (n=122)
Single-blind (researchers blinded to group assignment during post-intervention measurement and data analysis)
Complete randomization using RAND function in Excel
No
Does 12-week Tabata-style functional HIIT improve cardiometabolic health and habitual physical activity in female university students?
A 12-week low-volume Tabata-style functional HIIT program significantly improves cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, cardiometabolic markers, and habitual physical activity in female university students.
Estimación del efecto: d = 2.53 (95% CI 2.03-3.00)
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 38.56% vs 34.57%
valor p: p=<0.001
Introduction: The increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome and physical inactivity enhances exposure to cardiometabolic risk factors in university students. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) improved cardiometabolic health in clinical adults but the evidence in the university setting is limited. Furthermore, few studies examined the effect of low-volume HIIT on habitual physical activity (PA). Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 12-week Tabata-style functional HIIT for improving multiple cardiometabolic health outcomes and habitual PA. We also investigated whether changes in habitual PA over the intervention period had an impact on exercise-induced health outcomes. Methods: 122 female freshmen were randomized into the Tabata group (n = 60) and the control (n = 62). The Tabata training protocol involved 8 × 20 s maximal repeated functional exercises followed by 10 s rest with a frequency of 3 times per week for 12 weeks. Body composition, maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max ), blood pressure (BP), blood lipids, fasting glucose and insulin, C-reactive protein and PA were objectively measured using standardized methods. Dietary intake was measured using a valid food frequency questionnaire. All variables were measured pre- and post-intervention. Results: Mixed linear modelling results showed that there were large intervention effects on VO 2max ( p 0.001, d = 2.53, 95% CI: 2.03 to 3.00 for relative VO 2max ; p 0.001, d = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.76 to 2.68 for absolute VO 2max ), resting heart rate ( p 0.001, d = −1.82, 95% CI: −2.23 to −1.37), systolic BP ( p 0.001, d = −1.24, 95% CI: −1.63 to −0.84), moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) ( p 0.001, d = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.83 to 2.77), total PA ( p 0.001, d = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.53 to 2.41); moderate effects on %BF ( p 0.001, d = -1.15, 95% CI: −1.53 to −0.75), FM ( p 0.001, d = −1.08, 95% CI: −1.46 to −0.69), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ( p 0.001, d = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.42), total cholesterol ( p = 0.001, d = −0.64, 95% CI: −1.00 to −0.26); small effects on BMI ( p = 0.011, d = −0.48, 95% CI: −0.84 to 0.11), WC ( p = 0.043, d = −0.37, 95% CI: −0.74 to −0.01), low-density lipoprotein ( p = 0.003, d = −0.57, 95% CI: −0.93 to −0.19), HOMA-IR ( p = 0.026, d = −0.42, 95% CI: −0.78 to −0.05) and fasting insulin ( p = 0.035, d = −0.40, 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.03). Regression analysis showed that only the percentage change of HDL was associated with the change of MVPA (b = 0.326, p = 0.015) and TPA (b = 0.480, p = 0.001). Conclusion: From the findings of the study we can conclude that 12-week low-volume Tabata-style functional HIIT was highly effective for university female students to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, body fat, some cardiometabolic health outcomes and habitual PA.
Lu et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in Healthy female university students (n=122). Tabata-style functional high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Control (routine habits) was evaluated on Relative maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in mL/kg/min (d = 2.53, 95% CI 2.03-3.00, p=<0.001). A 12-week Tabata-style functional high-intensity interval training program significantly improved relative maximal oxygen uptake (d = 2.53) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity compared to control in female university students.