Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Using a discursive frame of meaning, Coleman's notions of the power and interests of actors in a collective decision-making process are reoriented to emphasize the power of competing understandings of a policy situation. The contribution of actors to the collective decision-making process has an impact through their association with various idea elements or discursive practices which comprise their cognitive maps. The performance of a computer simulation model of collective decision-making based on these assumptions is examined using cognitive maps and interview data collected from officials who participated in Norwegian oil policy decision-making. The simulation model produced a set of understandings that is more or less similar to the actual public debate on oil policy and a ranking of policy preferences that coincides with the actual decision to begin oil exploration in northern Norway.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael J. Shapiro
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
G. Matthew Bonham
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
Daniel Heradstveit
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
International Studies Quarterly
University of Hawaii System
American University
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shapiro et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a129deda4e03c9b06a3f45d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600590