In asymptomatic hypertensive patients, a modest elevation in BNP was associated with significantly greater left ventricular mass index (118 vs 97 g/m2) and increased coronary sinus expression of fibro-inflammatory biomarkers.
Cross-Sectional (n=41)
No
Does a modest elevation in BNP correlate with sub-clinical cardiac remodeling, inflammation, and extracellular matrix changes in asymptomatic hypertensive patients?
Modest elevations in BNP in asymptomatic hypertensive patients reflect early sub-clinical pathological processes including cardiac remodeling, inflammation, and extracellular matrix alterations.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 118% vs 97%
valor p: p=0.03
In asymptomatic subjects B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes even at levels well below contemporary thresholds used for the diagnosis of heart failure. The mechanisms behind these observations are unclear. We examined the hypothesis that in an asymptomatic hypertensive population BNP would be associated with sub-clinical evidence of cardiac remodeling, inflammation and extracellular matrix (ECM) alterations. We performed transthoracic echocardiography and sampled coronary sinus (CS) and peripheral serum from patients with low (n = 14) and high BNP (n = 27). Peripheral BNP was closely associated with CS levels (r = 0.92, p<0.001). CS BNP correlated significantly with CS levels of markers of collagen type I and III turnover including: PINP (r = 0.44, p = 0.008), CITP (r = 0.35, p = 0.03) and PIIINP (r = 0.35, p = 0.001), and with CS levels of inflammatory cytokines including: TNF-α (r = 0.49, p = 0.002), IL-6 (r = 0.35, p = 0.04), and IL-8 (r = 0.54, p<0.001). The high BNP group had greater CS expression of fibro-inflammatory biomarkers including: CITP (3.8±0.7 versus 5.1±1.9, p = 0.007), TNF-α (3.2±0.5 versus 3.7±1.1, p = 003), IL-6 (1.9±1.3 versus 3.4±2.7, p = 0.02) and hsCRP (1.2±1.1 versus 2.4±1.1, p = 0.04), and greater left ventricular mass index (97±20 versus 118±26 g/m(2), p = 0.03) and left atrial volume index (18±2 versus 21±4, p = 0.008). Our data provide insight into the mechanisms behind the observed negative prognostic impact of modest elevations in BNP and suggest that in an asymptomatic hypertensive cohort a peripheral BNP measurement may be a useful marker of an early, sub-clinical pathological process characterized by cardiac remodeling, inflammation and ECM alterations.
Phelan et al. (Mon,) conducted a cross-sectional in Asymptomatic hypertension (n=41). High BNP vs. Low BNP was evaluated on Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (p=0.03). In asymptomatic hypertensive patients, a modest elevation in BNP was associated with significantly greater left ventricular mass index (118 vs 97 g/m2) and increased coronary sinus expression of fibro-inflammatory biomarkers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: