Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract A survey of probably the most efficient solution methods currently in use for the problems K ϕ = ω 2 M ϕ and K Ψ = λ K G Ψ is presented. In the eigenvalue problems the stiffness matrices K and K G and the mass matrix M can be full or banded; the mass matrix can be diagonal with zero diagonal elements. The choice is between the well‐known QR method, a generalized Jacobi iteration, a new determinant search technique and an automated sub‐space iteration. The system size, the bandwidth and the number of required eigenvalues and eigenvectors determine which method should be used on a particular problem. The numerical advantages of each solution technique, operation counts and storage requirements are given to establish guidelines for the selection of the appropriate algorithm. A large number of typical solution times are presented.
Bathe et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: