The first sitting blood pressure measurement overestimated systolic blood pressure by an average of 1.64 mmHg compared to the second measurement, demonstrating a clear decline with successive readings.
Cohort (n=1,779)
No
Does arm side, body position, and successive measurements affect blood pressure variability and the estimated prevalence of hypertension in an elderly population?
Estimación del efecto: Mean difference 1.64 mmHg (95% CI 1.20-2.08)
BACKGROUND: Precise blood pressure (BP) measurements are central for the diagnosis of hypertension in clinical and epidemiological studies. The purpose of this study was to quantify the variability in BP associated with arm side, body position, and successive measurements in the setting of a population-based observational study. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the influence of different measurement conditions on prevalence of hypertension. METHODS: The sample included 967 men and 812 women aged 45 to 83 years at baseline. BP was measured according to a standardized protocol with oscillometric devices including three sitting measurements at left arm, one simultaneous supine measurement at both arms, and four supine measurements at the arm with the higher BP. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg. Variability in SBP and DBP were analysed with sex-stratified linear covariance pattern models. RESULTS: We found that overall, no mean BP differences were measured according to arm-side, but substantial higher DBP and for men also higher SBP was observed in sitting than in supine position and there was a clear BP decline by consecutive measurement. Accordingly, the prevalence of hypertension depends strongly on the number and scheme of BP measurements taken to calculate the index values. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, BP measurements should only be compared between studies applying equal measurement conditions and index calculation. Moreover, the first BP measurement should not be used to define hypertension since it overestimates BP. The mean of second and third measurement offers the advantage of better reproducibility over single measurements.
Lacruz et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in Blood pressure variability (n=1,779). Successive blood pressure measurements vs. First measurement was evaluated on Difference in systolic blood pressure between first and second sitting measurements (Mean difference 1.64 mmHg, 95% CI 1.20-2.08). The first sitting blood pressure measurement overestimated systolic blood pressure by an average of 1.64 mmHg compared to the second measurement, demonstrating a clear decline with successive readings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: