Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
We evaluate tactile-first robotic traversal on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) figure-8 mobility test using a two-way repeated-measures design across various algorithms (three tactile policies—M1 reactive, M2 terrain-weighted, M3 memory-augmented; a monocular camera baseline, CB-V; a tactile histogram baseline, T-VFH; and an optional tactile-informed replanner, T-D* Lite) and lighting conditions (Indoor, Outdoor, and Dark). The platform is the custom-built Eleven robot—a quadruped integrating a joint-mounted tactile tentacle with a tip force-sensitive resistor (FSR; Walfront 9snmyvxw25, China; 0–10 kg range, ≈0.1 N resolution @ 83 Hz) and a woven Galvorn carbon-nanotube (CNT) yarn for proprioceptive bend sensing. Control and sensing are fully wireless via an ESP32-S3, Arduino Nano 33 BLE, Raspberry Pi 400, and a mini VESC controller. Across 660 trials, the tactile stack maintained ∼21 ms (p50) policy latency and mid-80% success across all lighting conditions, including total darkness. The memory-augmented tactile policy (M3) exhibited consistent robustness relative to the camera baseline (CB-V), trailing by only ≈3–4% in Indoor and ≈13–16% in Outdoor and Dark conditions. Pre-specified, two one-sided tests (TOSTs) confirmed no speed equivalence in any M3↔CB-V comparison. Unlike vision-based approaches, tactile-first traversal is invariant to illumination and texture—an essential capability for navigation in darkness, smoke, or texture-poor, confined environments. Overall, these results show that a tactile-first, memory-augmented control stack achieves lighting-independent traversal on DHS benchmarks while maintaining competitive latency and success, trading modest speed for robustness and sensing independence.
Mazurick et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: