Left ventricular end-systolic diameter >61 mm independently predicted appropriate device therapy for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CRT-D (HR 2.66; P=0.001).
Cohort (n=269)
What are the independent predictors of sustained ventricular arrhythmias requiring appropriate device therapy in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator?
In patients receiving CRT-D, severe left ventricular dilation (LVESD >61 mm) is a strong independent predictor of sustained ventricular arrhythmias requiring appropriate device therapy.
Estimación del efecto: HR 2.66
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 51% vs 26%
valor p: p=0.001
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and risk stratification in this population remains poor. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study followed 269 patients (left ventricular ejection fraction 120 ms; New York Heart Association class III/IV) undergoing CRT with a defibrillator for 553±464 days after CRT with defibrillator implantation to assess for independent predictors of appropriate device therapy for VAs. Baseline medication use, medical comorbidities, and echocardiographic parameters were considered. The 4-year incidence of appropriate device therapy was 36%. A Cox proportional hazard model identified left ventricular end-systolic diameter >61 mm as an independent predictor in the entire population (hazard ratio HR, 2.66; P=0.001). Those with left ventricular end-systolic diameter >61 mm had a 51% 3-year incidence of VA compared with a 26% incidence among those with a less dilated ventricle (P=0.001). Among patients with left ventricular end-systolic diameter ≤61 mm, multivariate predictors of appropriate therapy were absence of β-blocker therapy (HR, 6.34; P61 mm is a powerful predictor of VAs, and further risk stratification of those with less dilated ventricles can be achieved based on assessment of ejection fraction, history of sustained VA, and absence of β-blocker therapy.
Friedman et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (n=269). Left ventricular end-systolic diameter >61 mm vs. Left ventricular end-systolic diameter ≤61 mm was evaluated on Appropriate device therapy for ventricular arrhythmias (HR 2.66, p=0.001). Left ventricular end-systolic diameter >61 mm independently predicted appropriate device therapy for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CRT-D (HR 2.66; P=0.001).