A home-based virtual hypertension programme increased home blood pressure measurements compared to usual care (9.9 vs. 1.2 per week, P<0.001) and successfully lowered average BP (P=0.01).
RCT (n=31)
randomized
Sí
Does a home-based virtual hypertension program managed by clinical pharmacists improve blood pressure control and monitoring behavior in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
A home-based virtual hypertension program managed by clinical pharmacists is feasible, safe, and significantly improves blood pressure monitoring and control compared to usual care.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 9.9% vs 1.2%
valor p: p=<0.001
INTRODUCTION: Implementing a health system-based hypertension programme may lower blood pressure (BP). METHODS: We performed a randomized, controlled pilot study to assess feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a home-based virtual hypertension programme integrating evidence-based strategies to overcome current barriers to BP control. Trained clinical pharmacists staffed the virtual collaborative care clinic (vCCC) to remotely manage hypertension using a BP dashboard and phone "visits" to monitor BP, adherence, side effects of medications, and prescribe anti-hypertensives. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were identified via electronic health records. Enrolled patients were randomized to either vCCC or usual care for 3 months. We assessed patients' home BP monitoring behaviour, and patients', physicians', and pharmacists' perspectives on feasibility and acceptability of individual programme components. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (vCCC = 17, usual care = 14) from six physician clinics completed the pilot study. After 3 months, average BP decreased in the vCCC arm (P = 0.01), but not in the control arm (P = 0.45). The vCCC participants measured BP more (9.9 vs. 1.2 per week, P 4.0, a pre-specified benchmark. Nine adaptations in vCCC design and delivery were made based on potential barriers to implementing the programme and suggestions. CONCLUSION: A home-based virtual hypertension programme using team-based care, technology, and a logical integration of evidence-based strategies is safe, acceptable, and feasible to intended users. These pilot data support studies to assess the effectiveness of this programme at a larger scale.
Gupta et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in uncontrolled hypertension (n=31). home-based virtual hypertension programme (vCCC) vs. usual care was evaluated on Home blood pressure measurements per week (p=<0.001). A home-based virtual hypertension programme increased home blood pressure measurements compared to usual care (9.9 vs. 1.2 per week, P<0.001) and successfully lowered average BP (P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: