Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
I advance a theoretically and empirically-grounded case for designing for and learning from failure, and instantiate it in a learning design called Productive Failure (PF). I describe the key mechanisms and the design principles of PF. The PF learning design comprises a generation and exploration phase followed by a consolidation and knowledge assembly phase. Findings show that the PF learning design is more effective in developing conceptual understanding and transfer than a direct instruction design. Follow-up studies are described wherein key aspects of the productive failure design were tested over multiple classroom-based studies as well as controlled experiments, and how these studies helped us interrogate and understand the criticality of key mechanisms embodied in the PF design. Implications for the learning theory and the design of instruction are discussed by situating findings in the long-standing instructivist-constructivist debate.
Manu Kapur (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: