Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Using 2-16% gradient gel electrophoresis, we examined low density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size in relation to plasma lipoproteins in 1,168 women and 1,172 men from the Framingham Offspring Study. In addition, we studied the effect of dietary intake on LDL size in a subset of the population. Seven LDL size peaks were identified, with the largest, LDL 1, being found in the density range 1.019-1.033 g/ml; LDL 2 and LDL 3 in d = 1.033-1.038 g/ml; LDL 4 and LDL5 in d = 1.038-1.050 g/ml; and the smallest, LDL 6 and 7, in d = 1.050-1.063 g/ml. Seventy-seven percent of the population had one major and at least one minor LDL peak. Secondary LDL peaks accounted for 23% of the total LDL relative area, based on laser scanning densitometry. LDL size distribution was skewed toward larger LDL particles in women (prevalence of LDL 1, 30% and of LDL 2, 31%), whereas men exhibited a more symmetric distribution (prevalence of LDL 3, 42%). The prevalence of small ( 1.038 g/ml) LDL particles 4-7 was 33% in men, 5% in premenopausal women, and 14% in postmenopausal women. In agreement with previous reports, small, dense LDL particles were significantly (p or = 160 mg/dl) had 1) a higher prevalence of LDL 3 and 4 (women only) and a lower prevalence of LDL 1 and 2 (women only) and 2) 11% higher LDL cholesterol to apo B ratios, even when matched for LDL particle size. Furthermore, low saturated fat and cholesterol intakes were significantly associated (p < 0.01) with smaller LDL particles. Therefore, the identification of small, dense LDL particles per se may not be a good indicator of coronary artery disease risk in population studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Campos et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: