December 1, 1989

Impartiality and Neutrality in Humanitarian Law and Practice

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

On 27 June 1986, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) gave judgment in the case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua. The case, involving Nicaragua against the United States of America, is remarkable in many respects, and so is the judgment. I should like to single out two special features: it deals with a situation of armed conflict, and it mentions the Red Cross.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Frits Kalshoven (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15a7e89b87f33fc69fbcd1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020860400074866

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Le piège : quand l'aide humanitaire remplace la guerre· 1986 · 9 citations
Constraints on the Waging of War· 1987 · 133 citations
Croix-Rouge et neutralité· 1936 · 5 citations
Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949· 1986 · 399 citations
Assisting the Victims of Armed Conflict and Other Disasters· 1989 · 20 citations

Authors

Frits Kalshoven

Leiden University

Journals

International Review of the Red Cross

Actions

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Impartiality and Neutrality in Humanitarian Law and Practice

Puntos clave

Resumen

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Also consider

Authors

Journals

Actions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Also consider