A novel 3-D ultrasonic reconstruction technique accurately estimated ventricular volume in animal hearts, yielding a correlation of r = 0.99 and an average error of 5% compared to actual volume.
Does a novel 3D ultrasonic technique accurately estimate ventricular volume in excised animal hearts?
A novel 3D ultrasonic imaging technique accurately estimates ventricular volume in excised animal hearts, showing potential for human application.
Estimación del efecto: r = 0.99
Real-time two-dimensional ultrasonic scanners provide a series of cross-sectional images of the ventricle. We have developed a technique which can determine the spatial position and orientation of a collection of such scans with respect to a reference coordinate system. The scans need not be parallel, may intersect, and need not demonstrate a complete cross section. The borders of interest are digitized to identify a set of points representing the surface of the ventricle. These points are used to generate a 3-D reconstruction of the chamber and are processed to give an estimate of ventricular volume. The technique has been validated using ten formalin-fixed hearts excised from dogs, sheep, and cows, with an actual volume range of 31.8-570.6 cm3. Each ventricle was imaged five times by three observers for a total of 150 studies. By the least squares linear regression analysis, calculated volume = 0.98 (actual volume) + 1.39 cm3, r = 0.99. The average error for all studies was 5 percent, while 88 percent of the individual calculated volume were within 10 percent of the actual volume. The method appears to offer the potential for the accurate assessment of ventricular volume in man.
Moritz et al. (Mon,) conducted a other in Ventricular volume assessment (n=10). 3-D ultrasonic reconstruction technique vs. Actual volume was evaluated on Ventricular volume estimation accuracy (r = 0.99). A novel 3-D ultrasonic reconstruction technique accurately estimated ventricular volume in animal hearts, yielding a correlation of r = 0.99 and an average error of 5% compared to actual volume.