Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
SummaryBackground Intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a leading cause of child mortality and disability. Magnetic resonance imaging, proton spectroscopy (MRI/MRS), and neurological assessments can predict outcomes, however sub-Saharan African data are lacking. We examined feasibility, findings, and prognostic accuracy of MRI/MRS and clinical assessments amongst NE infants in Uganda. Methods Neonates (≥36 weeks) with NE underwent MRI/MRS when clinically stable. MRI findings (Rutherford, NICHD criteria) and MRS metabolite ratios (lactate, N-acetyl aspartate, creatine, choline) were reported. General Movements Assessment (GMA) and Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) were conducted at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Prediction of adverse outcome (18–24 month death/neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI)) were analysed using receiver operating characteristic curves. Findings Amongst 51 neonates, 13 died before imaging and 6 were not imaged due to COVID-19 restrictions; 27/32 underwent MRI including 24 MRS (median 11 days, all diagnostic quality). Outcome was known for 21 infants, with 29% adverse (1 death, 5 NDI). MRI abnormalities occurred in 93%; 15% with moderate-severe BGT and 15% severe white matter injury, most (85%) consistent with hypoxia-ischaemia. Sensitivity/specificity for outcome were: MRI Rutherford (sensitivity 83%, specificity 93%); MRI NICHD (100%, 73%); MRS (83%, 92%); GMA (100%, 92%); and HINE (83%, 100%). Interpretation MRI, MRS, and neurological assessments were feasible in this Ugandan research setting and showed good prognostic accuracy for early childhood outcome after NE. Most had evidence of hypoxia-ischaemia on MRI, however injury patterns and MRS cutpoints differed from high-income country cohorts, possibly due to high mortality prior to imaging in this setting without access to intensive care. Funding The Gates Foundation grant OPP1210890.
Sadoo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: