Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Using the high-resolution N -body cosmological simulation COLOR, we explored the cosmic web (CW) environmental effects on subhalo populations and their internal properties. We used CaCTus , which incorporates an implementation of the state-of-the-art segmentation method NEXUS +, to delineate the simulation volume into nodes, filaments, walls, and voids. We grouped host haloes by virial mass, and segmented each mass bin into consecutive CW elements. This reveals that subhalo populations in hosts within specific environments differ on average from the cosmic mean. The subhalo mass function is affected strongly, where hosts in filaments typically contain more subhaloes (5–20%), while hosts in voids are subhalo-poor, with 25% fewer subhaloes. We find that the abundance of the most massive subhaloes, with reduced masses of μ ≡ M sub / M 200 is most sensitive to the CW environment. A corresponding picture emerges when looking at subhalo mass fractions, f sub , where the filament hosts are significantly more granular (having higher f sub ) than the cosmic mean, while the void hosts have much smoother density distributions (with f sub lower by 2 – 20% than the mean). Finally, when we look at the subhalo internal kinematic V max – R max relations, we find that subhaloes located in the void and wall hosts exhibit density profiles with lower concentrations than the mean, while the filament hosts demonstrate much more concentrated mass profiles. Across all our samples, the effect of the CW environment generally strengthens with decreasing host halo virial mass. Our results show that host location in the large-scale CW introduces significant systematic effects on internal subhalo properties and population statistics. Understanding and accounting for them is crucial for the unbiased interpretation of observations related to small scales and to satellite galaxies.
Hunde et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: