Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
This editorial explores the innovative application of large language Models (LLMs) in conducting systematic reviews, specifically focusing on quality assessment and risk-of-bias evaluation. As integral components of systematic reviews, these tasks traditionally require extensive human effort, subjectivity, and time. Integrating LLMs can revolutionize this process, providing an objective, consistent, and rapid methodology for quality assessment and risk-of-bias evaluation. With their ability to comprehend context, predict semantic relationships, and extract relevant information, LLMs can effectively appraise study quality and risk of bias. However, careful consideration must be given to potential risks and limitations associated with over-reliance on machine learning models and inherent biases in training data. An optimal balance and combination between human expertise and automated LLM evaluation might offer the most effective approach to advance and streamline the field of evidence synthesis.
Nashwan et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: