Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
In Brief Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of variations in the settings for minimum stimulation levels on speech understanding for adult cochlear implant recipients using the Med El Tempo+ speech processor. Design: Fifteen patients served as listeners. The test material included sentences presented at a conversational level in noise (74 dB SPL at +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio), sentences presented at a soft level in a quiet background (54 dB SPL), consonants in “vCv” environment (74 dB SPL re: vowel peaks), and synthetic vowels in “bVt” environment (54 dB SPL re: vowel peaks). The patients’ speech processors were programmed with minimum stimulation levels set to behavioral threshold, set to 10% of most comfortable loudness, and set to 0 μA. Results: The level of speech understanding achieved in the behavioral threshold condition was not significantly different from that achieved in either the 10% of most comfortable loudness or 0 μA conditions for any test material. Only 2 of the 15 patients demonstrated performance differences of greater than 10 percentage points between the 0 μA condition and the behavioral threshold condition on more than a single test. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that there are no grievous consequences, in terms of speech understanding, for setting minimum stimulation levels below behavioral thresholds. The time savings from setting thresholds to 10% of MCL or 0 μA may be especially useful during the initial device fitting. One of the most difficult and time-consuming aspects of fitting a cochlear implant speech processors to a patient is the mapping of minimum and maximum stimulation levels for each intra-cochlear electrode. It would be of significant benefit to clinicians if this process could be streamlined to reduce programming time without degrading speech understanding for the patient. This study examines the effect of setting minimum stimulation levels equal to behavioral threshold, to 10% of the maximum comfort level (MCL) or to 0 μA. Participants were 15 experienced Med El Tempo+ users with average to above average open-set speech understanding abilities. We found no evidence to suggest grievous consequences in terms of speech understanding for setting minimum stimulation levels below behavioral thresholds in an attempt to streamline the programming process and to provide an initial map to a patient.
Spahr et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: