Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty significantly improved mean coronary blood flow (33 vs 16 ml/min; p<0.05) and regional wall motion compared to conservative treatment in Q wave MI.
RCT (n=15)
Does PTCA improve coronary flow and myocardial viability in asymptomatic patients with Q wave MI and no residual ischemia?
Successful angioplasty of the stenotic infarct artery in patients with a Q wave MI and no residual ischemia improves coronary flow, thallium uptake, and regional wall motion, suggesting prolonged myocardial viability.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 33% vs 16%
valor p: p=<0.05
BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization in patients with persistent angina after myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of recurrent angina pectoris and myocardial infarction and improves left ventricular function. The results of revascularization after a Q wave myocardial infarction when there is no residual ischemia may depend on myocardial viability. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine whether there was viable myocardium in the infarct area in the absence of clinical and scintigraphic evidence of myocardial ischemia, 15 asymptomatic patients with a Q wave myocardial infarction, no redistribution on stress 201Tl test, and single-vessel disease (greater than 70% stenosis) with persistent anterograde blood flow were randomized to percutaneous transluminal coronary artery angioplasty (PTCA) or conservative medical treatment. After 2 months of follow-up, mean coronary blood flow measured by Doppler catheter in the infarct-related artery was higher in the PTCA treatment group (33 +/- 6 ml/min, n = 8) than in the conservative treatment group (16 +/- 4 ml/min, n = 7; p less than 0.05 between groups). The 201Tl pathological-to-normal ratios measured on postexercise images did not change in patients treated conservatively during the follow-up period (delta = +1.1 +/- 2.2%; NS from baseline) but increased significantly in patients treated by PTCA (delta = +8.5 +/- 2.3%; p less than 0.01 from baseline; p less than 0.05 between groups). Segmental wall motion improved on left ventricular angiography 2 months after PTCA (delta = +11.5 +/- 2.2%; p less than 0.001 from baseline) significantly more than in the conservative treatment group (delta = +4.1 +/- 1.4%; p less than 0.05 between both groups). Improvements of 201Tl ratios and segmental wall motion indexes correlated significantly (r = 0.73, p = 0.002). The mild improvement of global left ventricular ejection fraction measured in the PTCA treatment group did not differ significantly from changes in the conservative treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Successful angioplasty of the stenotic infarct artery in patients with a Q wave myocardial infarction and no residual ischemia improved coronary flow, 201Tl uptake in the infarct area, and regional wall motion. Therefore, myocardial viability may last several weeks, as long as residual blood flow persists in the infarct-related artery. Optimal assessment of viability by imaging techniques should identify patients who are most likely to benefit from revascularization.
Montalescot et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in Q wave myocardial infarction without residual ischemia (n=15). Percutaneous transluminal coronary artery angioplasty (PTCA) vs. Conservative medical treatment was evaluated on Mean coronary blood flow in the infarct-related artery (p=<0.05). Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty significantly improved mean coronary blood flow (33 vs 16 ml/min; p<0.05) and regional wall motion compared to conservative treatment in Q wave MI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: