The Probability of Repeated Admission (PRA) screen showed limited clinical utility for predicting nonroutine discharge planning, yielding an AUC of 0.74 for resource use and 0.79 for disposition.
Cohort (n=991)
Sí
Does the Probability of Repeated Admission (PRA) screen predict the need for nonroutine discharge planning in hospitalized adults?
The Probability of Repeated Admission screen has limited clinical utility for predicting complex discharge planning needs in hospitalized adults.
Estimación del efecto: AUC 0.74
valor p: p=<.001
OBJECTIVES: To test the predictive ability of the Probability of Repeated Admission (PRA) screen for nonroutine discharge planning (requiring new referrals for formal services). DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Two hospitals within a large Midwestern, tertiary care, referral-based system. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred ninety-one hospitalized adults identified using a systematic sampling strategy. MEASUREMENTS: The PRA screen was administered, and use of nonroutine discharge planning resources and nonroutine discharge disposition were determined using observation and open record review. Prolonged length of stay was determined by comparing the actual length of stay with the combined average length of stay for diagnosis-related groupings. RESULTS: Significant differences in PRA scores existed in two of three endpoints, but the differences were small, and the ranges of scores overlapped almost completely. Using, logistic regression, items predicting use of nonroutine discharge-planning resources were self-rated health, caregiver availability, age, and sex (chi-square (chi2) = 105.7, df = 9, P <.001), accounting for 17.9% of the variability and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.74. Self-rated health and sex predicted prolonged length of stay (chi2 = 15.3, df = 5, P =.009), but only explained 2.2% of the variability, with an AUC of 0.58. The predictors of nonroutine discharge disposition were self-rated health, caregiver availability, age, sex, and diabetes mellitus (chi2 = 125.8, df = 11, P <.001), accounting for 23.0% of the variability, with an AUC of 0.79. CONCLUSION: The clinical utility of using the PRA as a screen for early identification of persons who use nonroutine discharge planning is limited, although certain individual items may be useful.
Holland et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Hospitalized adults (n=991). Probability of Repeated Admission (PRA) screen was evaluated on Use of nonroutine discharge-planning resources (AUC 0.74, p=<.001). The Probability of Repeated Admission (PRA) screen showed limited clinical utility for predicting nonroutine discharge planning, yielding an AUC of 0.74 for resource use and 0.79 for disposition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: