PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1994Hypertension264 citations

Effects of a beta-blocker or a converting enzyme inhibitor on resistance arteries in essential hypertension.

View Full Paper
ESErnesto L. SchiffrinMedical Council of CanadaLDLi-Yuan DengMedical Council of CanadaPLPierre LarochelleSouth Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Structured PICO

Does cilazapril compared to atenolol improve the structure and function of resistance arteries in male patients with mild essential hypertension?

P
Population
17 male untreated mild essential hypertensive patients, aged 41 +/- 2 years.
I
Intervention
Cilazapril 2.5 to 5 mg/d for 1 year
C
Comparator
Atenolol 50 to 100 mg/d for 1 year
O
Outcome
Structure and function of subcutaneous resistance arteries (media-lumen ratio) at 1 yearsurrogate

In mild essential hypertension, treatment with the ACE inhibitor cilazapril, but not the beta-blocker atenolol, improves the structure and function of subcutaneous resistance arteries despite similar blood pressure reductions.

Abstract

Seventeen male untreated mild essential hypertensive patients aged 41 +/- 2 years agreed to participate in a double-blind randomized trial to test the effects of antihypertensive treatment on the structure and function of subcutaneous resistance arteries. Patients were treated with either 50 to 100 mg/d atenolol or 2.5 to 5 mg/d cilazapril. Blood pressure before treatment was 148 +/- 6/99 +/- 1 and 147 +/- 2/99 +/- 1 mm Hg, respectively. At 1 year of treatment blood pressure was 131 +/- 4/85 +/- 2 and 132 +/- 2/87 +/- 1 mm Hg, respectively. Resistance arteries (200 to 400 microns lumen diameter) dissected from subcutaneous gluteal biopsies obtained before treatment and at 1 year showed that the media-lumen ratio of arteries from patients treated with cilazapril was reduced to 6.31 +/- 0.21% from 7.54 +/- 0.31% before treatment (P < .05), still slightly but significantly larger (P < .05) than the media-lumen ratio of resistance arteries of normotensive control subjects (5.15 +/- 0.30%). In contrast, in arteries from patients treated with atenolol there was no significant change with treatment (7.97 +/- 0.60% before and 8.07 +/- 0.45% after 1 year of treatment). Active wall tension responses to endothelin-1 were blunted in hypertensive patients and normalized in the cilazapril-treated patients. Depressed active media stress responses to norepinephrine, arginine vasopressin, and endothelin-1 were accordingly normalized in the patients receiving cilazapril as the media width became thinner but were unchanged in those taking atenolol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schiffrin et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17b4cabee663e365ac7b04https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.23.1.83
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Progressive improvement in the structure of resistance arteries of hypertensive patients after 2 years of treatment with an angiotensin i-converting enzyme inhibitor comparison with effects of a ?-locker1995 · 135 citations
  2. 2Comparison of Effects of Angiotensin I– Converting Enzyme Inhibition and β-Blockade for 2 Years on Function of Small Arteries From Hypertensive Patients1995 · 192 citations
  3. 3Correction of Remodeling and Function of Small Arteries in Human Hypertension by Cilazapril, an Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor1996 · 34 citations
  4. 4Effects of Cilazapril on Vascular Structure and Function in Essential Hypertension1996 · 82 citations
  5. 5Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Versus β-Adrenergic Blockade on Aortic Stiffness in Essential Hypertension1996 · 36 citations