PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 17, 2018The North American Journal of Economics and Finance39 citationsOpen Access

Income convergence and the catch-up index

View Full Paper
CKChander Kant

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Defining a catch-up index that measures rich-poor country income convergence and comparing it to within group convergence (β-convergence), defining relative convergence as decrease in rich-poor country income ratio and absolute convergence as decrease in rich-poor country income gap, we derive an equation for years for income equality to the frontier (full convergence). Focusing on relatively homogeneous countries of Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, we show neither region has achieved either within group convergence or significant catching-up since 1951, and 21 of the 28 countries exhibiting catching-up in the most recent 21-years period, using US as the frontier, show falling behind over the longer period. We show years for full convergence depend also on the initial conditions; the neo-classical hypothesis that poorer countries grow faster means relative convergence, relative convergence is a necessary but not sufficient condition for absolute convergence; “Iron law of convergence” does not hold; and within group convergence is consistent with poorer countries in the group diverging absolutely while richer countries converge.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chander Kant (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17f1a0fb37ff6cad6f4c61https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.07.017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper