Unvaccinated cats were 2.871 times more likely to be infected with feline calicivirus compared to properly vaccinated cats.
Cross-Sectional (n=516)
Sí
Does FCV vaccination affect FCV infection prevalence and serum antibody titers in cats with suspected clinical signs?
FCV vaccination in cats in Hangzhou shows unsatisfactory efficacy, highlighting the need for improved vaccination protocols.
Estimación del efecto: OR 2.871 (95% CI 1.292-5.564)
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 26.5% vs 51.7%
valor p: p=0.008
BACKGROUND: Feline calicivirus (FCV) is a common pathogen of felids, and FCV vaccination is regularly practiced. The genetic variability and antigenic diversity of FCV hinder the effective control and prevention of infection by vaccination. Improved knowledge of the epidemiological characteristics of FCV should assist in the development of more effective vaccines. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the prevalence of FCV in a population of cats with FCV-suspected clinical signs in Hangzhou and to demonstrate the antigenic and genetic relationships between vaccine status and representative isolated FCV strains. METHODS: virus neutralization tests were used to assess antibody levels against isolated FCV strains in client-owned cats. RESULTS: The FCV-positive rate of the examined cats was 43.0%. Risk factors significantly associated with FCV infection were vaccination status and oral symptoms. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a radial phylogeny with no evidence of temporal or countrywide clusters. There was a significant difference in the distribution of serum antibody titers between vaccinated and unvaccinated cats. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a high prevalence and genetic diversity of FCV in Hangzhou. The results indicate that the efficacy of FCV vaccination is unsatisfactory. More comprehensive and refined vaccination protocols are an urgent and unmet need.
Zheng et al. (Fri,) conducted a cross-sectional in Feline calicivirus (FCV) infection (n=516). Proper vaccination (feline rhinotracheitis-calici-panleukopenia vaccine) vs. No vaccination was evaluated on FCV infection status (OR 2.871, 95% CI 1.292-5.564, p=0.008). Unvaccinated cats were 2.871 times more likely to be infected with feline calicivirus compared to properly vaccinated cats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: