This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Sungmin Lee’s Energy Phase in Cosmology (EPhiC) Ver.21, published on Zenodo, in dialogue with Vidamor Cabannas’s Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines the EPhiC model as a speculative cosmological framework based on energy phase transitions, resonance, dimensional formation, Z-axis energy streams, X–Y plane energy fields, dark matter synchronization, and the reinterpretation of the cosmic microwave background as a universal resonant frequency. The analysis confronts EPhiC with the Seven Absolute Truths of the Theory of Objectivity, especially the mathematical essence of Nothingness, the uniqueness of elements through their aura, the logical necessity of boundaries, relational observation, compositional hierarchy, and the transcendent substance beyond the quantum. It also articulates the EPhiC model with TO’s phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras. The article argues that EPhiC should not be understood as an empirical confirmation of the Theory of Objectivity, but as a fertile phenomenological and computational model capable of dialoguing with TO’s modal ontology. Particular attention is given to logical plasma, phase resonance, cosmic memory, information-radiation, atomic radiation, and the role of relational information as transcendent substance. The study concludes that Sungmin Lee’s EPhiC model reaches a high level of dialogical compatibility with the Theory of Objectivity, while still requiring stronger modal discipline, clearer ontological definitions, and more rigorous empirical protocols. This analytical text counted on the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Sungmin Lee; Energy Phase in Cosmology; EPhiC; modal ontology; logical cosmology; cosmic resonance; energy phase; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; cosmogonic theorem; cosmological Eras; atomic radiation; information-radiation; transcendent substance; cosmic microwave background; dark matter; Z-axis energy stream; X–Y energy fields; AI-assisted analysis.
Cabannas et al. (Wed,) studied this question.