Corporate decision-making is increasingly shaped by geopolitical competition, regulatory fragmentation and complex institutional environments. Traditional analytical tools—focused on markets and financial performance—are no longer sufficient to assess strategic risk. This paper develops a framework for integrating strategic intelligence into corporate governance and international business strategy. It combines political risk analysis, stakeholder mapping and political due diligence to explain how institutional dynamics influence investment outcomes, regulatory exposure and operational continuity. The analysis argues that geopolitical risk is no longer an external variable but a structural component of corporate strategy. In sectors such as energy, finance, infrastructure and technology, firms must interpret political power, regulatory trajectories and stakeholder systems to make effective decisions. The paper proposes a practical framework based on five analytical lenses: jurisdictional structure, regulatory trajectory, stakeholder architecture, geopolitical exposure and strategic optionality. It shows how corporations can move from reactive compliance to anticipatory decision-making. As global fragmentation intensifies, strategic intelligence becomes a core capability for boards, executives and investors operating across complex jurisdictions.
Parejo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.