Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Recently, deep neural network (DNN) hardware accelerators have been reported for energy-efficient deep learning (DL) acceleration 1–6. Most prior DNN inference accelerators are trained in the cloud using public datasets; parameters are then downloaded to implement AI 1–5. However, local DNN learning with domain-specific and private data is required meet various user preferences on edge or mobile devices. Since edge and mobile devices contain only limited computation capability with battery power, an energy-efficient DNN learning processor is necessary. Only 6 supported on-chip DNN learning, but it was not energy-efficient, as it did not utilize sparsity which represents 37%-61% of the inputs for various CNNs, such as VGG16, AlexNet and ResNet-18, as shown in Fig. 7.7.1. Although 3–5 utilized the sparsity, they only considered the inference phase with inter-channel accumulation in Fig. 7.7.1, and did not support intra-channel accumulation for the weight-gradient generation (WG) step of the learning phase. Also, 6 adopted FP16, but it was not energy optimal because FP8 is enough for many input operands with 4× less energy than FP16.
Lee et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: