A deep neural network for automatic classification of cardiac arrhythmias from 12-lead ECGs achieved an average F1 score of 0.813, outperforming 4 traditional machine learning methods.
Cardiac arrhythmias
Deep neural network vs 4 machine learning methods using expert features
Average F1 score
Electrocardiogram (ECG) is a widely used reliable, non-invasive approach for cardiovascular disease diagnosis. With the rapid growth of ECG examinations and the insufficiency of cardiologists, accurate and automatic diagnosis of ECG signals has become a hot research topic. In this paper, we developed a deep neural network for automatic classification of cardiac arrhythmias from 12-lead ECG recordings. Experiments on a public 12-lead ECG dataset showed the effectiveness of our method. The proposed model achieved an average F1 score of 0.813. The deep model showed superior performance than 4 machine learning methods learned from extracted expert features. Besides, the deep models trained on single-lead ECGs produce lower performance than using all 12 leads simultaneously. The best-performing leads are lead I, aVR, and V5 among 12 leads. Finally, we employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations method to interpret the model's behavior at both the patient level and population level.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dongdong Zhang
Wuhan University of Technology
Samuel Yang
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Xiaohui Yuan
University of North Texas
iScience
The Ohio State University
Wuhan University of Technology
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Mon,) conducted a other in Cardiac arrhythmias. Deep neural network vs. 4 machine learning methods using expert features was evaluated on Average F1 score. A deep neural network for automatic classification of cardiac arrhythmias from 12-lead ECGs achieved an average F1 score of 0.813, outperforming 4 traditional machine learning methods.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a2a130fc4dc4e42436b8b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102373