PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Real-world utilization of upfront genomic testing in newly diagnosed non–small cell lung cancer in a rural state.

View Full Paper
KTKimberly J. ToomireJWJeanne WishengradNHNicole Hudak

Key Points

  • To characterize the utilization of genomic testing in newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer patients in rural Maine.
  • Conducted a retrospective study of adults with biopsy-confirmed stage IB-IV NSCLC diagnosed between April 2020 and September 2024.
  • Collected genomic testing results from Tempus and demographic data from tumor registry and electronic medical records.
  • Utilization comparisons were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Chi-square tests.
  • Among 1,024 patients, 435 (42.5%) underwent genomic testing; tested patients were younger and more likely to have adenocarcinoma than non-tested patients.
  • In stage IV disease, testing was more prevalent at academic centers (60.8%) than community sites (52.8%, p = 0.045).
  • Testing rates increased over time for stage IV disease and adenocarcinoma, with access issues highlighted among rural residents.

Abstract

e23377 Background: Comprehensive genomic testing (NGS) to inform biomarker-driven therapy is a standard recommendation in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There is emerging evidence to support testing in early-stage NSCLC. Maine has a high incidence of lung cancer and is the most rural state with the oldest population in the U.S. Real-world genomic test utilization in this setting has not been well-characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of adults with biopsy-confirmed stage IB-IV NSCLC diagnosed between April 2020 and September 2024 in the MaineHealth Cancer Care Network. NGS results closest to diagnosis were obtained from Tempus (Chicago, IL) and demographic and clinical data from our tumor registry and EMR. Zip codes were used to determine rurality. Utilization was compared across subgroups using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Chi-square tests. Results: Among 1,024 patients with stage IB-IV NSCLC, 435 (42.5%) underwent upfront genomic testing with a median age of 69 years; 53.1% female, 98.6% white, and 55.6% Medicare enrollees. Compared with those who did not receive testing, tested patients were younger (69 vs. 72 years), more often adenocarcinoma (70.6% vs. 45.7%), and more often former (69.2% vs. 63.3%) or never smokers (10.8% vs. 5.4%). In stage IV disease (N = 621), testing was more common at the academic cancer center compared to community sites (60.8% vs. 52.8%, p = 0.045). In early-stage disease (IB-III, N = 403) and adenocarcinoma (N = 576), testing was more frequent among urban residents (80.6% vs 71.7%, p = 0.044; 70.6% vs. 61.9%, p = 0.029, respectively). In squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, N = 252), testing was more common at community sites (44.9% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.04). Testing rates trended up from 2020 to 2024 in stage IV disease and adenocarcinoma, but remained variable in early-stage disease and SCC as depicted in the table. Conclusions: Fewer than half of patients with stage IB-IV NSCLC underwent upfront comprehensive genomic profiling across a statewide network. Testing was less common among rural residents and those treated at community sites in early stage, stage IV, and adenocarcinoma. Patients with SCC were more likely to be tested in the community, possibly reflecting practice variation or small sample size. While testing rates increased in stage IV disease and adenocarcinoma over time, patterns in early-stage and SCC fluctuated, likely influenced by evolving guideline recommendations. Our findings highlight gaps in access to precision oncology in Maine and underscore the need for improvements, such as the implementation of reflex testing algorithms, enhanced physician and patient awareness, and financial support. Year Stage IV Adenocarcinoma Early-Stage SCC 2020 (Apr-Dec) 33.9% 37.9%, 33.3%, 32.4% 2021 42.1% 41.6% 19.2% 25.5% 2022 46.5% 60.6% 43.3% 33.9% 2023 49.6% 66.4% 54.8% 47.1% 2024 (Jan-Sep) 51.4% 55.9% 38.7% 37.3%

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Toomire et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a80730307b7850943261chttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e23377
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract 3426: Real-world biomarker testing rates and trends among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the US2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Evaluating reflexive NGS and testing rates in community oncology.2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Abstract 3675: Identifying determinants of molecular testing for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the rural United States2026
  4. 4Genomic Testing Uptake Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Cancer2026
  5. 5Abstract 6122: Disparities in biomarker testing practices in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States (US)2024