January 1, 1969

A comparison between manual and automatic indexing methods

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

Abstract The effectiveness of conventional document indexing is compared with that achievable by fully automatic text processing methods. Evaluation results are given for a comparison between the MEDLARS search system used at the National Library of Medicine and the experimental SMART system, and conclusions are reached concerning the design of future automatic information systems.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Cite This Study

Gerard Salton (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1abb6fe916fa6dd3b8eff4 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630200109

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Factors determining the performance of indexing systems1966 · 417 citations
2The SMART automatic document retrieval systems—an illustration1965 · 97 citations
3Annual Review of Information Science and Technology2008 · 114 citations
4Information dissemination and automatic information systems1966 · 20 citations
5Evaluation of the MEDLARS Demand Search Service1969 · 62 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar