The UKGRIS trial is a cluster-randomized protocol of 3000 patients designed to evaluate whether the GRACE risk score improves guideline-indicated care and 12-month outcomes in NSTEACS.
RCT (n=3,000)
1:1 cluster randomized
Sí
Does management according to the GRACE risk score improve the use of guideline-indicated therapies and reduce adverse clinical outcomes in patients hospitalised with NSTEACS?
This protocol outlines a cluster-randomized trial to evaluate whether implementing the GRACE risk score improves guideline adherence and clinical outcomes in patients with NSTEACS.
Introduction For non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) there is a gap between the use of class I guideline recommended therapies and clinical practice. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score is recommended in international guidelines for the risk stratification of NSTEACS, but its impact on adherence to guideline-indicated treatments and reducing adverse clinical outcomes is unknown. The objective of the UK GRACE Risk Score Intervention Study (UKGRIS) trial is to assess the effectiveness of the GRACE risk score tool and associated treatment recommendations on the use of guideline-indicated care and clinical outcomes. Methods and analysis The UKGRIS, a parallel-group cluster randomised registry-based controlled trial, will allocate hospitals in a 1:1 ratio to manage NSTEACS by standard care or according to the GRACE risk score and associated international guidelines. UKGRIS will recruit a minimum of 3000 patients from at least 30 English National Health Service hospitals and collect healthcare data from national electronic health records. The co-primary endpoints are the use of guideline-indicated therapies, and the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, new onset heart failure hospitalisation or cardiovascular readmission at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include duration of inpatient hospital stay over 12 months, EQ-5D-5L responses and utilities, unscheduled revascularisation and the components of the composite endpoint over 12 months follow-up. Ethics and dissemination The study has ethical approval (North East - Tyne Pre-results.
Everett et al. (Sun,) conducted a rct in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (n=3,000). GRACE risk score and associated treatment recommendations vs. standard care was evaluated on use of guideline-indicated therapies, and the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, new onset heart failure hospitalisation or cardiovascular readmission. The UKGRIS trial is a cluster-randomized protocol of 3000 patients designed to evaluate whether the GRACE risk score improves guideline-indicated care and 12-month outcomes in NSTEACS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: