March 9, 2002Open Access

Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

conception and design of the study, collection of data on links, interpretation of data, and drafting of the paper. NQM carried out the statistical analysis. KKH, FCA, MIR, HMK, and REP were involved

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Heinke Kunst (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1b3f455433ff9ab7969703 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.581

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Clinical websites are currently dangerous to health2001 · 46 citations
2Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.1997 · 878 citations
3Melanoma Information on the Internet: Often Incomplete—A Public Health Opportunity?2002 · 37 citations
4Use of the Web for Medical Information by a Gastroenterology Clinic Population2000 · 118 citations
5Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware1997 · 1,162 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo