ABSTRACT This text explores silence as a state of fullness rather than absence, describing it as the medium through which communication between the “I” and the inner energetic self becomes possible. The author examines how mental noise, generated by the constant flow of thoughts received through consciousness, interferes with this communication. Silence emerges as the condition in which the energetic self can transmit signals, insights, and impressions to the “I,” bypassing the confusion of ordinary thought. The work positions silence as a functional threshold that enables inner perception and the emergence of non‑conceptual understanding. OpenAIRE Description This contribution examines silence as a functional threshold enabling communication between the “I” and the inner energetic self. The work describes how continuous mental activity, generated by the unfiltered transmission of thoughts through consciousness, creates interference that obscures inner signals. Silence is presented as a state of fullness in which this interference subsides, allowing the emergence of non‑conceptual insights transmitted by the energetic self. The text offers a phenomenological framework for understanding silence as a medium for inner perception and as a condition that supports the dynamics of consciousness, liminality, and self‑communication. EXTENDED DESCRIPTION This work investigates silence as a state of fullness that enables communication between the “I” and its inner energetic self. The author begins by observing that silence arises when there are no questions, and that in this condition the “I” becomes synchronous with its energetic counterpart, which does not need to respond when no inquiry is posed. Silence is described as the score on which the exchange between exteriority and interiority travels. When this score is disturbed by the interference of thoughts—floating, overlapping, and settling—the quality of communication deteriorates. The text emphasizes that the mind is never naturally silent; it is constantly receiving thoughts through a resonance mechanism in which consciousness captures and transmits any type of thought without selection. This continuous influx creates a state in which noise becomes normality and silence the exception. Between consciousness, which transmits, and the mind, which receives and reasons, stands the “I,” which attempts to select but is often overwhelmed by the density and confusion of thoughts. A crucial point is that the mind not only fails to distinguish the quality of thoughts but also fails to perceive the energetic inputs transmitted by the inner energetic self. These inputs—signals, concepts, ideas—are of a different order, yet they are often lost within the mental noise. The author argues that the existence of this inner energetic self is supported by the activity observed during sleep, where mental and cerebral processes continue even though the physical body rests. This inner being is presented as the part of oneself that remains active and alive during sleep. The challenge arises in wakefulness, where the “I” must navigate the confusion of thoughts that form an energetic barrier to receiving transmissions from the inner self. However, when mental silence occurs—even briefly—something becomes perceptible. What arrives may be faint, like a flash, but it is distinguishable precisely because the usual murmur of thoughts is absent. When the score is cleared, silence begins to speak. The work positions silence as a functional threshold that enables the emergence of inner communication. It suggests that cultivating mental silence allows the “I” to perceive signals from the energetic self, opening a pathway to deeper interiority and non‑conceptual understanding. Silence is thus reframed not as emptiness but as a state of fullness that supports the transmission of meaning from within. Keywords (EN) Silence Liminality Inner energetic self Consciousness Thought resonance Mental noise Non‑conceptual cognition
Oliva FMOO (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: