Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Purpose – This paper aims to address the green purchasing gap by: exploring environmentally conscious consumers’ mental representation of the barriers responsible for the green purchasing gap; assessing which barriers are perceived as the most relevant in hampering the purchase of green products for environmentally conscious consumers; and investigating the relationships among these barriers. Although consumers are increasingly concerned about environmental deterioration, the current market share of green products remains fairly low. Design/methodology/approach – An introspective qualitative study is conducted; 51 environmentally conscious consumers showing a green purchasing gap are interviewed, and the data are analysed with a cognitive mapping technique (Decision Explorer software) and Freeman’ structural indices (UCINET software). Findings – Higher price and scarce availability of green products are the main barriers to green purchasing. However, consumers’ perceptions of price and availability may vary by changing other barriers (e.g. green products displacement inside the store and in-store communication). Originality/value – This work reconstructs the decisional premises of environmentally conscious consumers’ choices to not purchase green products, identifies the most relevant barriers to green purchasing behaviour and the relationships between these barriers. With this knowledge, marketers of green products can focus on the most important barriers so that interventions in these barriers may change environmentally conscious consumers’ perceptions of other related barriers.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Camilla Barbarossa
École Supérieure de Commerce de Toulouse
Alberto Pastore
Sapienza University of Rome
Qualitative Market Research An International Journal
Sapienza University of Rome
Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Barbarossa et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bf1da4cc49ccc94a8fa51 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/qmr-06-2012-0030